New anatomical insights into preventing brow ptosis with botulinum toxin-A use

Authors

  • Matt Sandre, MD, FRCPC

Abstract

Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) injections were the most commonly performed  non-surgical procedure in 2020 according to the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics. Between 2019 and 2020, the number of neurotoxin injections performed in the United States has risen 1.5 fold from 1,712,994 to 2,643,366. When utilizing BTX-A in the upper face, the incidence of eyebrow ptosis varies widely and has been quoted in the literature at upwards of 20%. This adverse event is not exclusively seen post-treatment of the frontalis muscle but can also occur through inadvertent diffusion of the neurotoxin when treating the glabellar complex. Over the past year, new anatomic considerations to help injectors optimize results and reduce the risk of eyebrow ptosis with frontalis and glabellar BTX-A injections have been published. This paper aims to summarize three such publications which may help to positively impact injectable outcomes in the clinician’s day-to-day practice.  

Author Biography

Matt Sandre, MD, FRCPC

Dr. Matt Sandre is a dermatologist practicing in Toronto, Ontario at the Canadian Dermatology Centre. He attended the University of Western Ontario where he completed an Honours Bachelor of Medical Sciences degree. Dr. Sandre then returned to Western University to obtain a Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree, where he earned the gold medal in his class. He practiced as a pediatric emergency and pediatric oncology nurse prior to attending medical school at McMaster University. He completed his dermatology residency at the University of Toronto where he served as co-chief resident. Aside from working as a community dermatologist, he is currently completing a Clinical Fellowship in Dermatologic Laser Surgery and Aesthetic Dermatology.

References

Surgery TAS for AP, The American Society For Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic (Aesthetic) Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. https://cdn.surgery.org/media/statistics/aestheticplasticsurgerynationaldatabank-2020stats.pdf. Published 2020. Accessed May 9, 2021.

Surgery TAS for AP, The American Society For Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic (Aesthetic) Surgery National Data Bank Statistics https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/Aesthetic-Society_Stats2019Book_FINAL.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed May 9, 2021.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. BOTOX indications approved FDA. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/103000s5232lbl.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2021.

Monheit G. Neurotoxins: Current concepts in cosmetic useon the face and neck: Upper face (glabella, forehead, and crow’s feet). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(Suppl):72S–75S.

Anido J, Arenas D, Arruabarrena C, et al. Tailored botulinumtoxin type A injections in aesthetic medicine: Consensus panel recommendations for treating the forehead based on individual facial anatomy and muscle tone. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017;10:413–421.

Brin MF, Boodhoo TI, Pogoda JM, et al. Safety and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of facial lines: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from global clinical registration studies in 1678 participants. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(6):961-970.

Cotofana S, et al. The bidirectional movement of the frontalis muscle: Introducing the Line of Convergence and its potential clinical relevance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(5):1155-1162.

Davidovic K, et al. To click or not to click – The importance of understanding the layers of the forehead when injecting neuromodulators – A clinical, prospective, interventional, split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1385-1392.

Cotofana S, et al. Respecting upper facial anatomy for treating the glabella with neuromodulators to avoid medial brow ptosis-A refined 3-point injection technique. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;00:1-9.

King M. Management of ptosis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9:E1–E4.

Kim YJ, Lim OK, Choi WJ. Are there differences between intradermal and intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin on the forehead? Dermatologic Surg. 2020;46(12):e126-e131.

Jun JY, Park JH, Youn CS, Lee JH. Intradermal injection of botulinum toxin: a safer treatment modality for forehead wrinkles. Ann Dermatol. 2018;30(4):458-461.

Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(7):1321-1333.

Pavicic T, Frank K, Erlbacher K, et al. Precision in dermal filling: a comparison between needle and cannula when using soft tissue fillers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(9):866-872.

Pavicic T, Yankova M, Schenck TL, et al. Subperiosteal injections during facial soft tissue filler injections-Is it possible? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;19(3):590-595.

Rosamilia G, Hamade H, Freytag DL, et al. Soft tissue distribution pattern of facial soft tissue fillers with different viscoelastic properties. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(2):312-320.

Carruthers A, Carruthers J. Prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study of botulinum toxin type A in men with glabellar rhytids. Dermatologic Surg. 2006;31(10):1297-1303.

Rzany B, Ascher B, Fratila A, Monheit GD, Talarico S, Sterry W. Efficacy and safety of 3-and 5-injection patterns (30 and 50 U) of botulinum toxin A (dysport) for the treatment of wrinkles in the glabella and the central forehead region. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(3):320-326.

Glabelares R, De Almeida RT, Kadunc BV. Glabellar wrinkles: a pilot study of contraction patterns. Surg Cosmet Dermatol. 2010;2(1):23-8.

Published

2021-05-01

How to Cite

1.
Sandre M. New anatomical insights into preventing brow ptosis with botulinum toxin-A use. Can Dermatol Today [Internet]. 2021 May 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 15];2(2):30–34. Available from: https://canadiandermatologytoday.com/article/view/2-2-sandre

Issue

Section

Articles